Image from the colloquium by Ian Nelson Mills (can you see me?). |
Publisher’s description:
The textual history of the New Testament is a dynamic tradition, reflecting differing readings, interpretations and uses of its canonical writings. Twenty years after the publication of D.C. Parker’s celebrated volume The Living Text of the Gospels, the papers in this collection provide further insight into the lives of the New Testament text. One especially important focus for the New Testament as “living text” is its use in Christian worship: individual chapters examine the importance of liturgical manuscripts in Coptic and Greek traditions, alongside consideration of broader themes related to the lectionary text. Several famous biblical passages are the subject of extended treatment, including the Pericope de Adultera, Jesus’ teaching on the Temple in Mark, and the Lukan genealogy. The contributions represent original research by an international range of scholars, first presented at the Tenth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament.I am very pleased to have received proofs a few days ago of my chapter which will open the volume, “Was There and Alexandrian Recension of the Living Text of the Gospels?,” in which I interact with Parker’s Living Text as well as the question of an Alexandrian textual recension, an issue that has received some attention after Brent Nongbri’s recent redating of Papyrus 75.
A few other blogposts related to the topic of my article here, here and here
Here you can read all about the wonderful colloquium organized by Hugh Houghton who is also the editor of the volume.
As much as I appreciate the textual tradition of the older churches (the LXX among the Orthodox), the NT is where I depart from them. You can see bits and pieces where I think they added liturgical traditions. The most famous example is probably the doxology at the end of the Lord's Prayer not extant in earlier manuscripts.
ReplyDeleteNot that they're too different though, thankfully...
Looking forward to this.
ReplyDelete