Monday, September 11, 2006

John 21 in Wikipedia

The article on John 21 in Wikipedia needs some improvement (even Wikipedia's quality standards are dissatisfied). As an occasional Wikipedian I'd urge someone to bring in some balance to the article (while bearing in mind Wikipedia's discouragement of deletion).


  1. I have made a contribution. Perhaps some who are more familiar with the debate can hone it some. I am particularly curious as to whether Westcott is being used in-context here.

  2. Thanks. Westcott thinks that ch. 21 was not part of the original design, but was still added by the original author (John the apostle) before the text was extensively copied.