Friday, August 27, 2010

New Fragment of Greg.-Aland 2491

3
In 2006 I noted the existence of a fragment with Matt 3:16-4:21 in Columbia University Rare Book and Manuscript Library, shelfmark Med/Ren Frag. 49 (image shows fol. 1v).

According to the notes in the internal library file, the fragment was taken from a manuscript copied in a monastery at Mt. Athos. Another note attributed to Dr. Erich Junkelmann, dated 1936, reads: "the Prussian State Library, Berlin, also acquired some leaves of this set." An anonymous note in the folder reads: "The other leaf presented to Dr. Chickering, Jamaica High School, 18 October 1938."

After consultation with Michael Welte of the INTF in Münster the fragment was identified as a leaf from Greg.-Aland 2491, and I sent this information back to the curator of the holding institution. This now meant that different parts of this MS had been located in four different places – Berlin, Bern, Durham and New York (36 folios are still in Berlin, and another 24 folios are in Bern, whereas there were now two folios known in the US, in Columbia University Rare Book and Manuscript Library and in Duke University Library, respectively). Moreover, I assumed that "the other leaf presented to Dr. Chickering" is the one in Duke that contains Matt 22:31-23:10.

I subsequently blogged about this fragment last year here as I announced the "Catalogue of Greek Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the Collections of the United States of America" edited by Nadezhda Kavrus-Hoffmann, of which several installments have been published in the journal Manuscripta (Brepols). Kavrus-Hoffmann had indicated in the first part of the catalogue (published 2005) that this fragment was "not in Aland" (i.e., had not been assigned a Greg.-Aland number).

As noted, however, I have reported back to Consuelo Dutschke, Curator of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts at Columbia University, about this and other items in 2006, and suggested that she should add the updates and some corrections to this and other items. Apparently, she did not do anything with the information I provided (for example, the Greg.-Aland number is still not indicated in the digital catalogue of the Scriptorium (founded by Dutschke and her collegaue), and neither the fragments of the same MS in other institutions). Kavrus-Hoffmann, however, has told me that she will of course add the new information to her addenda and corrigenda.

In any case, the Liste dates the MS to the 12th cent. whereas Kavrus-Hoffmann dates it to the late 13th or early 14th cent. in her catalogue.

Very recently I was contacted by Christopher Moss of the Department of Art and Archaeology at Princeton University. He wrote to me:
Having seen your very interesting post identifying the fragment of Aland 2491 at Columbia University, I thought that you might be interested to know that our newly published catalogue of Greek manuscripts in Princeton (just released this month) identifies Princeton University Library, Princeton MS. 63, as another fragment of this manuscript, specifically, the eight folios that immediately followed the Columbia fragment, containing Matthew 4:21–5:17.

This interesting piece of information about the Princeton folios was already mentioned in the comment to my original blogpost last year made by Nadezhda Kavrus-Hoffmann. She then also mentioned the new catalogue of the Princeton collection that was in preparation. Unfortunately, this fragment has been assigned a new Greg.-Aland number at some point, Greg.-Aland 2850 (dated to the 11th cent.), and so has the Duke fragment in Durham (Greg.-Aland 2617) but they are the same MS as Greg.-Aland 2491. (I note that in the VMR online Liste, the Columbia and Princeton fragments need to be added to the entry Greg.-Aland 2491. [TW: This is now updated])

The Princeton catalogue is expected to be published in just a few days – more information about it is found here. Moss has been kind enough to send me a review copy.

According to the entry for Princeton MS. 63, it was acquired in February 1940 from Dr. Junkelmann in Munich, who may have purchased it on Mount Athos. The catalogue further states with reference to the Bern catalogue edited by P. Andrist that the leaves in Bern and some of the folios in Berlin were also acquired from Junkelmann in Munich.

This made me curious about this Dr. Junkelmann, who sold fragments of this manuscript to Berlin, Bern, Columbia and Princeton and provided information in the form of notes about the provenance, etc, today kept in the various library files. Apparently, Junkelmann was an art historian and music composer who lived first in Leipzig and later in Munich.

The eight folios in Princeton include one folio that followed the Columbia fragment containing 4:21–5:17. The seven other folios contain Matthew 11:17–14:15. The editors of the new catalogue, Sofia Kotzabassi and Nancy Patterson Ševčenko, date the MS to the 12th century in accordance with the Kurzgefasste Liste, whereas Kavrus-Hoffmann, as noted, dates it to the late 13th or early 14th cent. The catalogue also includes a plate of the MS.

Update: Ulrich Schmid reports that the VMR online Liste has now been updated as far as additional items are concerned (although the dating issue is under review).

Monday, August 23, 2010

Coptic Unicode Font

4
The International Association of Coptic Studies commissioned a unicode font which is now available in a stable version called Antinoou. The beta version was known as Keft. I have created a digital keyboard which is free and works well with MS Word. You can download it from my Coptic digital resources webpage. In a few months, I hope to update the keyboard to include Old Nubian characters.

UPDATE: This is apparently the final beta version, and not the final release. A few minor wrinkles remain to be ironed out.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Dan Wallace’s “The Conspiracy Behind the New Bible Translations”

7
Dan gives a good introduction to KJV-onlyism here, and deals with the conspiracy theories behind it: http://bible.org/article/conspiracy-behind-new-bible-translations

I’m not sure when the article was first written, but TC-Alternate-List implies it is new and offers a counterpoint here: http://adultera.awardspace.com/AE/Wallace-Conspiracy.html

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Digitized Greek NT MSS of Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana pt. 1

0
Digital images of GNT MSS of Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana pt. 1

Hugh Houghton has drawn my attention to the digital database of the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana where one can find nearly all of the Plutei GNT codices, which I have indiced below. I divide this index into two parts because of the maximum number of tags allowed to a blogpost. The second part follows immediately below this post.

Cod. Plut. IV.1 = GA 454

Cod. Plut. IV.5 = GA 455

Cod. Plut. IV.29 = GA 457

Cod. Plut. IV.30 = GA 456

Cod. Plut. IV.31 = GA 458

Cod. Plut. IV.32 = GA 459

Cod. Plut. VI.2 = GA L113

Cod. Plut. VI.5 = GA 832

Cod. Plut. VI.7 = GA L114

Cod. Plut. VI.8 = GA 1976

Cod. Plut. VI.11 = GA 182

Cod. Plut. VI.13 = GA 363

Digitized Greek NT MSS of Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana pt. 2

1
Digital images of GNT MSS of Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana pt. 2

Cod. Plut. VI.14 = GA 183

Cod. Plut. VI.15 = GA 184

Cod. Plut. VI.16 = GA 185

Cod. Plut. VI.18 = GA 186

Cod. Plut. VI.21 = GA L115

Cod. Plut. VI.23 = GA 187

Cod. Plut. VI.24 = GA 364

Cod. Plut. VI.25 = GA 188

Cod. Plut. VI.26 = GA 833

Cod. Plut. VI.27 = GA 189

Cod. Plut. VI.28 = GA 190

Cod. Plut. VI.29 = GA 191

Cod. Plut. VI.30 = GA 192

Cod. Plut. VI.31 = GA L116

Cod. Plut. VI.32 = GA 193

Cod. Plut. VI.33 = GA 194

Cod. Plut. VI.34 = GA 195

Cod. Plut. VI.36 = GA 365 not available.

Cod. Plut. VII.9 = GA 2035

Cod. Plut. VII.29 (fol. 193-224 = GA 2052

Cod. Plut. VIII.12 = GA 196

Cod. Plut. VIII.14 = GA 197

Cod. Plut. IX.10 = GA 2007

Cod. Plut. X.04 = GA 1919

Cod. Plut. X.06 = GA 1920

Cod. Plut. X.07 = GA 1921

Cod. Plut. X.09 = GA 1977

Cod. Plut. X.19 = GA 1922 not available

Cod. Plut. XI.06 = GA 834

Cod. Plut. XI.07 = GA 1978

Cod. Plut. XI.18 = GA 836

Monday, August 16, 2010

Sinaiticus Facsimile by Hendricksons

29
Hendrickson Publishers are now advertising the new facsimile edition of Codex Sinaiticus to be released in November.

Retail: $799.00
Size: 13.5 x 16.5 inches
Binding: cloth with slipcase
Pages: 828
Pub Date: November 2010
ISBN: 9781598565775
ISBN-13: 9781598565775

From the advertisement:
The Codex was hand-written in Greek by fourth-century scribes, only 300 years after the time of the New Testament, making it one of the earliest and most reliable witnesses to the biblical text. It contained the Old and New Testaments in Greek, the text adopted by early Greek-speaking Christians.

The Codex was preserved for centuries at the monastery of St. Catherine’s, Mount Sinai, until Constantin von Tischendorf drew worldwide attention and notoriety to it in 1844. In the years following, its pages were divided and dispersed. Now, over 160 years later, after an extraordinary and historic collaborative effort by the British Library, the National Library of Russia, St. Catherine’s Monastery, Leipzig University Library, and Hendrickson Publishers, all the extant pages of Codex Sinaiticus have been brought together in print form to a worldwide audience in this handsomely bound, one-of-a kind, facsimile edition.

Drawing on the expertise of leading scholars, conservators, and curators, and painstakingly photographed using the latest high-quality digital technology and a careful imaging process, this facsimile provides a life-like view of the original pages of the Codex. The delicate beauty of this important text—its parchment, inks, and scars, all visible in incredible detail—allows the fascinating textual history of the Christian Bible to come alive in a fresh, meaningful way. The generous trim size, protective cloth covering, and slipcase make this facsimile an attractive part of any biblical scholar’s library. Accompanied by a 32-page booklet, the Codex would be a stunning addition to a church, university, or seminary library, as well as to a museum or personal collection.

What texts can I find in the Codex Sinaiticus?
As it survives today, Codex Sinaiticus comprises just over 400 large leaves of prepared animal skin, each of which measures (13.6 inches) wide by 380mm (15 inches) high. On these parchment leaves is written around half of the Old Testament and Apocrypha (the Septuagint), the whole of the New Testament, and two early Christian texts not found in modern Bibles. Most of the first part of the manuscript (containing most of the so-called historical books, from Genesis to 1 Chronicles) is now missing and presumed to be lost. .

The Septuagint includes books which many Protestant Christian denominations place in the Apocrypha. Those present in the surviving part of the Septuagint in Codex Sinaiticus are 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, 1 & 4 Maccabees, Wisdom and Sirach. .

The number of the books in the New Testament in Codex Sinaiticus is the same as that in modern Bibles in the West, but the order is different. The Letter to the Hebrews is placed after Paul’s Second Letter to the Thessalonians, and the Acts of the Apostles between the Pastoral and Catholic Epistles. .

The two other early Christian texts are an Epistle by an unknown writer claiming to be the Apostle Barnabas, and ‘The Shepherd’, written by the early second-century Roman writer, Hermas.