Friday, December 04, 2009

Biblioblog Top 50 update

by at 7
Earlier this week I mentioned the monthly Biblioblog Top 50. Apparently, however, it will only be updated twice a year from now on. A new top 50 list was just published based on visits from June-November. Now this blog is ranked #18.

7 comments

  1. Peter M. Head12/04/2009 2:49 pm

    Do we care?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Peter M. Head12/04/2009 2:49 pm

    BoW

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim12/04/2009 2:51 pm

    of course you do or you wouldn't have mentioned that you don't care. if you REALLY didn't care, you would never even notice it or mention it. in the same way that i don't care about rugby and so i never mention it at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tommy Wasserman12/04/2009 3:08 pm

    On the one hand, I know both Peter and I appreciate very much that we have interested readers (especially readers active in textual criticism), as reflected in the comments, in these kind of statistics, and in other ways.

    On the other hand, we both probably don't like to compete (unless it is in racewalking or powerpoint presentations - I admit that I don't have a chance there).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tommy Wasserman12/04/2009 3:11 pm

    I should also add that I personally think it is good to "connect" with the other biblioblogs (that is why I added a biblioblogroll), in much the same way as gathering physically for conferences. It is good that the biblioblogs interact with and refer to each other in various positive ways.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Peter M. Head12/04/2009 4:20 pm

    Tommy,
    You are usually so earnest, except when teasing me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Peter M. Head12/04/2009 4:20 pm

    I am in end of term Friday.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )