Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Gospel of Barnabas and Diatessaron

2
I've just finished reading the following fascinating article:

August den Hollander and Ulrich Schmid, 'The Gospel of Barnabas, the Diatessaron and Method', Vigiliae Christianae 61 (2007) 1-20.

The article argues cogently against the need to postulate that there was an Old Latin (pre-Vulgate) version of the Diatessaron using the following arguments:

'a) The OL Diatessaron hypothesis raises more questions than it answers;
b) The OL Diatessaron hypothesis is based on unsafe textual analysis;
c) The OL Diatessaron hypothesis is based on anachronistic assumptions and anachronistic use of source material' (p. 5)

I particularly like the following quotation:

'But this is exactly what the Old Latin Diatessaron hypothesis wants us to believe: The Old Latin Diatessaron tradition, despite its powerful presence in the 13th-15th centuries—as evidenced by the many vernacular representatives—is gone without a trace in its original language. From a purely historical perspective this is very difficult to believe.' (p. 6)

Abstract
Since the beginning of the 20th century research aiming at reconstructing Tatian’s lost Gospel harmony Diatessaron utilizes a growing number of late 13-15 c. texts extant invarious Western vernaculars for this purpose. As the most recent example Jan Joosten introduced the so-called Gospel of Barnabas, a composition perhaps as late as the 16th or17th century as a potential source for readings of the Diatessaron (2nd c.). With special emphasis on methodological issues, this essay offers a detailed critique of Joosten’s analysis as well as a general critique of that type of research as carried out by other scholars in the past.

2 comments :

  1. Thanks for the reference, I look forward to reading it. I wonder what they do about the evidence for Justin's "harmony" as precursor to Tatian, and its use in Latin (pre-Vulgate).

    ReplyDelete
  2. theswain:

    "Thanks for the reference, I look forward to reading it. I wonder what they do about the evidence for Justin's "harmony" as precursor to Tatian, and its use in Latin (pre-Vulgate)."

    Justin's "harmony" was not part of the exercise. Therefore you won't find any discussion of that in our article. Besides, what evidence do you have in mind (Boismard or Petersen)?

    Ulrich Schmid

    ReplyDelete