Saturday, December 10, 2005

Christmas variants

As we are in Advent it seems rather appropriate to consider variants from some of the famous Christmas passages. IMHO the earliest text of Matthew 1:16 is not in significant doubt (so the Nativity plays can go on). Yet there is an interesting variant in Θ f13 it (the peculiarities of the Old Syriac recorded in NA27 do not reflect any real Greek Vorlage). Would anyone like to make suggestions as to how and when this variant arose?

4 Comments:

Blogger Peter M. Head said...

I didn't know that baptists recognised Advent.

2:29 PM, December 10, 2005  
Blogger Peter M. Head said...

Check A. Globe, ‘Some Doctrinal Variants in Matthew 1 and Luke 2, and the Authority of the Neutral Text’ CBQ 42(1980)

2:31 PM, December 10, 2005  
Blogger C. Stirling Bartholomew said...

It looks like some theologically motivated scribe with a view to christological controversy just could not wait for the story to unfold in the following verses so he decided to make more details of the nativity narrative explicit in the genealogy.

5:04 PM, December 10, 2005  
Blogger C. Stirling Bartholomew said...

... Also, the most likely cause of concern behind this christologically motivated variant was the expression TON ANDRA MARIAS which could hardly be misunderstood in light of the following narrative but read in isolation from the context might have been the source of mischief among the enemies of orthodoxy.

6:44 PM, December 10, 2005  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.