The Top 20 Keywords Driving Traffic to This Site

The top 20 keywords driving traffic to this site from search engines (updated monthly on Alexa) are:

codex sinaiticus online
textual criticism
devil bible
codex sinaiticus
the devil's bible
bart ehrman interview mp3
alexandrian witnesses
wallace ehrman debate
peter head textual
criticism
misquoting jesus
swedish seminaries
greek new testament online
sbl tov scribal habits
charles agousi
"textual criticism" programs
randy harris oxy
maurice robinson
p-39 for sale
coptic keyboard askeland

We note that Codex Sinaiticus and textual criticism have now surpassed the devil's bible. Christian Askeland has moved into the top-20 with a coptic keyboard. Peter Head is sitll associated with something textual. I suppose randy harris is Rendell Harris, but who is charles agousi?

Top Search Terms Driving Traffic to this Blog

What are the top search terms driving traffic to this blog from search engines this month? This is possible to find out at Alexa. Some were expected, others turned out to be rather unexpected. This is the top-ten terms that directs people from the search engines to this blog (the list is updated monthly):

#1 devils bible
#2 devil's bible
#3 codex gigas
#4 the devils bible
#5 the devil's bible
#6 misquoting jesus
#7 alexandrian witnesses
#8 maurice robinson
#9 evangelical textual criticism
#10 peter head textual

The devil's bible or Codex gigas keeps driving traffic to this blog, and so is the "misquoting Jesus"-issue. Many will have read Peter William's extensive review of Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus, his interview with Ehrman and some subsequent thoughts on the topic. Today I noticed an an on-line lecture by William's from 2006 offering an analysis of the book. (The talk starts a while into the soundfile after some chatting.)

Maurice Robinson is the "most wanted" ETC blogger, slightly less popular than the Alexandrian witnesses :-). I am sure Peter Head likes the idea that people connects him with "textual" (which is probably "textual criticism" - there seem to be a three-word limit to this data).