The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.
Posts
Comments
7 Comments:
Thanks for mentioning, Mike. Already tons more, thanks to Holger Szesnat.
Thanks for this, Mark, but please be careful not to populate your site with too much old stuff. So far, most of your articles we have all read years ago.
It is ok to not have much on your site right now. Put the new stuff out; we've probably all read the old stuff you've put out there now.
Just a suggestion.
Thanks, Anon. Holger has been making these excellent additions. I realize that many will have read these already, but the site is also to an extent an archive of links to useful older materials that many will not have read yet. We'll make sure we are careful in watching how it grows, though, and will bear your comments in mind.
Mark,
Double-check the link to Kelhoffer's essay on Ad Marinum. I'm pretty sure that online access to that essay has been withdrawn.
Also, I invite you to check out the files and and links at the TC-Alternate Yahoo! discussion-group. I suspect that some of them will fit your list.
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.
Thanks, James. We've currently got the Kelhoffer piece linked to the archive.org version of the article. We'll have a look at the TC links you mention in due course -- thanks.
Dr. Goodacre:
Perhaps even now as you are building your list of sources, you could put all articles written X years ago in an Archives section.
If you come across an article written, for example, in 1993, I recommend that this article go directly to your Archives. That way, serious TC readers can concentrate on newer material without having to week through a lot of old stuff. Finally, be sure to put the DATE -- as plain as Dallas -- on EVERY article.
Thanks for building this page on your site.
Thanks, Anon. If you spot an article with no date, let us know. I understand your point about newer materials, but I think it is important to have classics and older pieces in the list too. To break up the list up and relegate some to an "archives" area would not be helpful, I don't think. Bear in mind that we are only linking to materials, not providing the materials ourselves.
Post a Comment