“That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
Read here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
A forum for people with knowledge of the Bible in its original languages to discuss its manuscripts and textual history from the perspective of historic evangelical theology.
- Contributors
- Peter M. Head (ed)
- Tommy Wasserman (ed)
- P. J. Williams, and others
procrastinating? I'd like to suggest likely scribal error behind that character sequence: harmonization to near context in the lexicon.
ReplyDeleteprognosticating
DeleteSo if Paul dictated Romans to Tertius this might explain the Rom 5:1 ο/ω conundrum and who knows what else? Perhaps some articles or particles also went missing during the dictation/transcription process? And then what should constitute the "autograph" -- what Paul actually said,or what Tertius wrote? Pandora's can of worms, it seems.
ReplyDeleteDr. Robinson, I try to answer that question in the article,
Delete"What are the NT Autographs? An Examination of the Doctrine of Inspiration and Inerrancy in Light of Greco-Roman Publication." JETS 59/2 (June 2016): 287-308.