tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post5586449857013614305..comments2024-03-28T00:45:18.442+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Textual Criticism on the MoonP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-2542050641776163762016-09-12T03:33:14.208+01:002016-09-12T03:33:14.208+01:00prognosticatingprognosticatingThe White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-18482682849499185492016-09-09T20:42:05.349+01:002016-09-09T20:42:05.349+01:00Dr. Robinson, I try to answer that question in the...Dr. Robinson, I try to answer that question in the article,<br /><br />"What are the NT Autographs? An Examination of the Doctrine of Inspiration and Inerrancy in Light of Greco-Roman Publication." JETS 59/2 (June 2016): 287-308.Timothy N. Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10696299768205488795noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-83186833014754748922016-09-09T18:36:52.733+01:002016-09-09T18:36:52.733+01:00So if Paul dictated Romans to Tertius this might e...So if Paul dictated Romans to Tertius this might explain the Rom 5:1 ο/ω conundrum and who knows what else? Perhaps some articles or particles also went missing during the dictation/transcription process? And then what should constitute the "autograph" -- what Paul actually <i>said</i>,or what Tertius <i>wrote</i>? Pandora's can of worms, it seems. Maurice A. Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685965674144539571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-24307950117463064512016-09-09T14:10:25.042+01:002016-09-09T14:10:25.042+01:00procrastinating? I'd like to suggest likely sc...procrastinating? I'd like to suggest likely scribal error behind that character sequence: harmonization to near context in the lexicon.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.com