Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Verbal dissidence principle


"Since scribes would frequently bring divergent passages into harmony with one another, in parallel passages (whether quotations from the Old Testament or different accounts in the Gospels of the same event or narrative) that reading which involves verbal dissidence is usually to be preferred to one which is verbally concordant." Metzger, Textual Commentary, 13*.

Does anyone know any discussions of this principle?

Simon

4 Comments:

Blogger Peter M. Head said...

I'm sure this is generally discussed under the heading of harmonisation. E.G. A.H. Cadwallader, 'The Correction of the Text of Hebrews towards the LXX' Novum Testamentum XXXIV(1992)257-292

12:45 PM, March 04, 2008  
Blogger Dirk Jongkind said...

And this one might be of relevance:
W.F. Wisselink, Assimilation as a Criterion for the Establishment of the Text: A Comparative Study on the Basis of Passages from Matthew, Mark and Luke (Kampen: Kok, 1989).

1:03 PM, March 04, 2008  
Blogger Martin Heide said...

And you won't miss that neither:

Tov, E.: “The Nature and Background of Harmonizations in Biblical Manuscripts” in: JSOT 31 (1985), pp. 3-29.

6:28 AM, March 05, 2008  
Blogger Simon Gathercole said...

Thanks a lot, chaps.

Simon

10:39 AM, March 07, 2008  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.