Jim Snapp (here) announces a debate hosted by 'The Pristine Faith Restoration Society' (sounds like something got lost somewhere) on textual criticism. The debate is quite lengthy, but ranges through historical, theological and textual issues. I'd be grateful to anyone who could provide a digest of the most significant hinges of the debate and of any major clarifications achieved. The debate is here.
The debate is said to be one about 'Text Types', which are also entities said by some not to exist (simplification).