Friday, October 21, 2011

"The Son of God Was in the Beginning (Mark 1:1)" – (Free Access)

I have just provided a link on my institutional webpage to a free access version of my JTS article, ”The Son of God Was in the Beginning (Mk 1:1)." Journal of Theological Studies 62/1 (2011): 20-50. (Just scroll down to the title and link to the article.)

13 Comments:

EDGAR EBOJO said...

This is great! Thanks, Tommy.

EDGAR EBOJO said...

Wish list: 2011 SBL-IM papers by Jeff Cate and Peter Williams on Mark 1:1 :)

pgardella said...

Thank you!

Note that the link on your institutional webpage has extra characters at the end which prevent it from being downloaded for free. You need to remove the "[new_link]" from the end.

Tommy Wasserman said...

Dear pgardella, I do hope it works now. I tried 20 times...

Tommy Wasserman said...

By the way, it works in my webbrowser.

Peter Malik said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peter Malik said...

thank you very much!

Peter Rodgers said...

Tommy, Thank you so much. A great resource for my students. Peter Rodgers

drew said...

Thank you!

Jeff Cate said...

Tommy, thanks for making this available. Great title, btw.

Edgar: I haven't had a chance to put some finishing touches and tie up a couple of loose ends on my paper. Thank you for your interest in it.

Brice Jones said...

Thanks so much, Tommy! This is a brilliant article.

EDGAR EBOJO said...

Thanks for the info, Jeff :)

Ched said...

Thanks!

Love the title.


The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.