Stephen Carlson has posted a helpful series of errata lists for Swanson's work on Galatians:
Galatians in P46
Galatians in B
Galatians in 01
Galatians in A
Galatians in C
Galatians in D
Galatians in 1424
One fairly consistent issue seems to be Swanson's treatment of corrections, which leaves something to be desired in terms of clarity and accuracy.
A forum for people with knowledge of the Bible in its original languages to discuss its manuscripts and textual history from the perspective of historic evangelical theology.
- Contributors
- Peter M. Head (ed)
- Tommy Wasserman (ed)
- P. J. Williams, and others
Is it that Swanson doesn't stick to his own paradigm for dealing with corrections, or is it his paradigm itself which you see as problematic?
ReplyDeleteThe problem is not his paradigm--that can handle corrections all right. It's mainly that manuscript corrections (more than any other feature) confuse him and he either ignores them or misreads them.
ReplyDeleteAdd "when he errs" to the end of my last sentence.
ReplyDeleteI highly suggest that no one click on any of the links on the 'home pages' of the recent rash of spam commenters.
ReplyDelete