
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.
This is a forum for people with knowledge of the Bible in its original languages to discuss its manuscripts and textual history from the perspective of historic evangelical theology.
The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.
8 Comments:
6 is P52; 9 is P1
No. 3 is P115, the fragment that contains the number of the beast.
8 appears to be P45
7 is P46
1. recto of P116 (showing Heb 2:9-11)
2. a fragment of P118 (showing Rom 15:33-16:1)
4. upper part of a leaf of P75 (P. Bodmer XV) (showing the ending of Luke)
5. part of a leaf of P66 (showing John 7:34-35)
10. part of the verso of P39 (showing John 8:14)
Well, obviously that was too easy. Do you want a harder one?
To make it even easier, how about lableing each photo in the original post?
That anonymous is not this anonymous - whoever that anonymous is. My eyes are still blurry from eye strain.
Cheers,
Malcolm
Post a Comment