
What struck me are the many ligatures where the vertical strokes of the letters are combined, not unlike the ligatures in some of the later 4th century codices.

This example shows the combination of Î Î Î in ÏηΜ ÏολÎčΜ, the one below shows a combination of Î ÎŁ in the second line, but compare the line below where the two letters are written separately.

I do not intend to make a study of the development of such ligatures and of the localities where and the times when, but I could see some potential in such a project (unless this has been done already, of course).
In case you are interested, this is the full transcription of the text (taken from ConcEyst, with thanks):
áŒĄ λαΌÏÏÎżÏᜱÏη Î ÏÎčÎ·ÎœáœłÏΜ
ጞ᜜ΜÏΜ ÏáœčλÎčÏ
Îșα᜶ áŒĄ ÎșÏ. ÎČÎżÏ Î»áœŽ Îșα᜶
Ï᜞ ÏÎčλοÏáœłÎČαÏÏÎżÎœ ÏÏ ÎœáœłÎŽÏÎčÎżÎœ
ÏáżÏ γΔÏÎżÏ Ï᜷αÏ
áŒÏΔ᜷ΌηÏαΜ ÎșαÏᜰ Ïᜰ
ÏÎżÎ»Î»áœ±ÎșÎčÏ áœÏ᜞ αáœÏáż¶Îœ
áŒÎœ ÎșÎżÎčÎœáż· ÎŽÎč áœÏÎż ΌΜηΌᜱÏÏΜ
λογÎčÏÎžáœłÎœÏα áŒÏ᜶ ÎČÎżÏ Î»Î”ÎșÎșληÏÎčáż¶Îœ
Îșα᜶ ÎŽÎčᜰ ÏηÏÎčÏΌᜱÏÏΜ
áœÏáœČÏ áœ§Îœ áŒÏÎżÎč᜔ÏαÏÎż
ÎŽÎčᜰ Ïáż¶Îœ áŒÏÏáż¶Îœ ÏΔÏ᜶
ÏᜎΜ ÏáœčλÎčΜ áŒÎœÎ±Î»ÏΌᜱÏÏΜ
Î. ÎáœÏ. ΀αÏÎčαΜ᜞Μ ÎČ ÏοῊ
ÎáœÏÏáœ”ÎŒÎżÎœÎżÏ ÏοῊ Î Ïλλ᜷ÏÎœÎżÏ
Ï᜞Μ áŒÎłÎżÏαΜáœčÎŒÎż
Îșα᜶ ÏÎ±ÎœÎ·ÎłÏ Ï᜷αÏÏÎżÎœ ÏáżÏ
ΠολÎčáœ±ÎŽÎżÏ ÎžÎ”ÎżáżŠ áŒÎžÎ·ÎœáŸ¶Ï
Îșα᜶ ÏÏÎżÏÏᜱÏηΜ ÏáżÏ ΞΔοῊ
Îșα᜶ áŒÏÏÎčÏÏ᜻ÏαΜÎčΜ Îșα᜶
ÎČÎżáœ»Î»Î±ÏÏÎżÎœ Ï᜞Μ ÏÏΔÏαΜηÏáœčÏÎżÎœ.
ΔáœÏÏ ÏΔáżÏΔ
I am no expert on epigraphy but two things strike me here. The first is the Attic sigma (ÎŁ). When I took my epigraphy class, I think that I learned that the lunate sigma (C) was the standard for the imperial period. I would assume that this is an archaism on the part of the producer of the monument maybe even with the Athenian goddess in mind.
ReplyDeleteSecond, the formula/sentence structure used is parallel to what one would find on in a Latin monument. I would guess that this is quite standard by the fourth century.