Saturday, November 15, 2025

New issue: TC Journal 30 (2025) at a New Home

2

Big News about TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 

 

The TC journal has now begun migrating to a new homepage alongside Journal of Biblical Literature and Review of Biblical Literature at the Scholarly Publishing Collective and in terms of layout it has gone through an extreme make-over taking it from the 1990's into the 2020's in terms of appearance and accessibility.

 

 

The current volume 30 has just been published on the new homepage and all previous issues will migrate in the coming weeks. The journal was started by Jimmy Adair in 1996 and is one of the first open access academic electronic journals in the world. Personally I started working on this journal from the SBL meeting in 2009 and soon became senior editor. This also happens to be the journal in which I published my own first academic article back in 2002.

The 2025 volume contains five articles and four notes, and there will also be a number of reviews and a review article soon to be added. As ever, all content is open access.

ARTICLES

The Greek Subscriptions to Hebrews and the Position of the Letter in the Corpus Paulinum

Christian Schøler Holmgaard


Altered, Not Antique: The Latinized Greek Text of 1 Corinthians in GA 629

Andrew J. Patton

 

The Crux of Psalm 22:17: At the Crossroads of Textual and Literary Criticism

Seth D. Postell; Joseph L. Justiss

 

Otto Thenius and Zacharias Frankel on the Text of the Books of Samuel

Theo A.W. van der Louw

 

Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text

Matthew Whidden

 

Notes

A Note on the “Sons of God” in Latin Quotations of Deut 32:8d

Chrissy M. Hansen

 

Reuniting Codex Angus (GA L2378) with Its Lost Bifolium

Hefin J. Jones

 

Missing the Forest for the Trees: A Response to Richard Fellows

Elizabeth Schrader Polczer

 

The Presence of Martha in the Archetype of the Bethany Narrative in John: A Counter-Response to Elizabeth Schrader Polczer

Richard G. Fellows



2 comments

  1. Though I am not as well versed as they are in the issues discussed by Schrader Polczer and Fellows (and some others they cite), I am not fully convinced by either. Here's a question.
    Is it always, or sometimes, significant who in a list is named first, and is it sometimes in context more emphatic who is named last?

    ReplyDelete