AI destroying the joy of human creativity, as drawn by AI |
Copilot
Here are ten essential books in New Testament Textual Criticism that are highly recommended for anyone interested in the field:
- The Text of the New Testament by Kurt and Barbara Aland - A comprehensive guide to the text of the New Testament.
- The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research edited by Bart D. Ehrman, Michael W. Holmes, and Bruce M. Metzger - An overview of the current state of research in New Testament textual criticism.
- The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture by Bart D. Ehrman - Examines how early Christological controversies affected the text of the New Testament.
- Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism by Eldon J. Epp and Gordon D. Fee - Focuses on the theory and methodology of textual criticism.
- The Text of the New Testament by Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman - Discusses the transmission, corruption, and restoration of the New Testament text.
- An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts by D. C. Parker - A technical guide to New Testament manuscripts.
- The Living Text of the Gospels by D. C. Parker - Explores the text of the Gospels in detail.
- Introduction to the New Testament in the Original Greek by B. F. Westcott and F. J. A. Hort - A classic work laying the foundation for textual criticism.
- The Story of the New Testament Text: Movers, Materials, Motives, Methods, and Models by Robert F. Hull - Covers the history and development of the New Testament text.
- Textual Scholarship and the Making of the New Testament by David C. Parker - Discusses the procedures and challenges of New Testament textual scholarship.
These books provide a solid foundation for understanding the principles and practices of New Testament textual criticism. Do any of these titles catch your interest?
Gemini
Here are ten essential books in New Testament Textual Criticism, presented in no particular order:
- The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration by Bruce M. Metzger: A classic and comprehensive overview of the field.
- Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman: A popular and accessible introduction to textual variants.
- A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament by Bruce M. Metzger: A detailed reference work examining variant readings for each verse of the Greek New Testament.
- The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism by Kurt and Barbara Aland: A foundational work on the principles and methods of textual criticism.
- A Student's Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods and Results by Paul D. Wegner: A user-friendly guide for students.
- New Testament Textual Criticism: A Concise Guide by David Alan Black: A brief and accessible introduction.
- Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism by Eldon J. Epp and Gordon D. Fee: A more advanced work exploring critical methodologies.
- The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament by Bart D. Ehrman: A controversial but influential work examining the impact of theological biases on the transmission of the text.
- The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis edited by Bart D. Ehrman, Michael W. Holmes, and Bruce M. Metzger: A collection of essays by leading scholars.
- A History of the Synoptic Problem by David L. Dungan: While focused on the Synoptic Gospels, this work delves into the complexities of textual transmission within the Gospels.
Note: This is not an exhaustive list, and the "best" books will depend on your individual needs and level of expertise.
I hope this helps!
What I take away from this exercise is that, in this case at least, AI is little more than repackaged search engine. Both results are basically just Tommy's post with maybe some rearrangement or rewording. For example, I suspect Gemini's description of Ehrman's Orthodox Corruption as "controversial" is coming straight from Tommy's post. The same can be said of Copilot's description of Westcott and Hort's introduction. Some of the descriptions are obviously just the book's subtitles. So, kudos to the authors for picking descriptive subtitles, but not exactly a win for AI.
Only Gemini gives any sources but, alas, only one of them makes much sense. They are a random blog post on Isaiah, a Catalan Wikipedia entry on the Hebrew Gospel hypothesis, and a German theology faculty booklist. None of them are Tommy's blog post, which appears to be the main source. Positively, these lists are pretty good (thanks to Tommy!) and all the books listed are real books.
I did ask ChatGPT as well and its answers were similar except that it oddly included Raymond Brown's Introduction to the New Testament and Ehrman's edition of the Apostolic Fathers (which it recognizes was not directly about NTTC). Finally, one point of praise goes to ChatGPT for this introductory line which is spot on: "New Testament textual criticism (NTTC) is a fascinating and complex field."
What.... no Myths and Mistakes on the list? There's the problem with AI.
ReplyDeleteThere are a ton of things AI can do but being a replacement for Google isn't something it's going to cause anyone to fall to their knees over. In fact, Google already uses an AI when it gives you your search results so this kind of question is pointless (sorry!). What it is good at is evaluating data. I've used it to write programs in several languages and I've used it to help me with genetics research. It's very good at focusing on tasks if you give it the boundaries within which to work. I'm a simple layman so I can't think of any good NT criticism related questions, but I would challenge you to come up with some questions where it could, let's say, look at an image of a text and analyze letters. I know you guys quibble a lot over the evolution of the writing. That might be a good place to challenge it.
ReplyDeleteI figured the entire list from Gemini would have consisted of Ehrman's popular (non-academic) works.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTrue story: when I'm not pretending to be a textual critic, I am off playing fireman. Standards for firefighting in North America are established by the NFPA, and they have a textbook, multiple textbooks actually, curriculum, courses and exams, everything you could imagine. Last month I was doing yet another certification course and part of it included a series of online tests. The test don't actually count for anything, but you have to complete them in order to proceed. All the answers come directly from the textbook or the published NFPA standards, so if you don't happen to know the answer, it is very easy just to look it up. One particular day I did not have access to the books, and I couldn't remember the answer to a test question, so I decided to give AI a try. I read the question right off of the test to Gemini, and it immediately gave me a very correct sounding answer that even quoted a specific section and paragraph of the relevant NFPA standard. The answer sounded right to me, so I went ahead and entered that into the test. And then I lost the point cause the answer was wrong! I was a bit surprised. Obviously I'd seen some of the sillier mistakes that AI can make, and then there's mistakes that aren't silly but at least are obvious, like putting Raymond Brown's NT intro on a text criticism list, but I had yet to see a mistake that looked so thoroughly correct. I mean it quoted verbatim from the relevant NFPA standard! I was so annoyed I took the time to download the relevant standard and scroll through the voluminous PDF on my little phone screen and when I got to the relevant section in paragraph, I was shocked to find that Gemini had utterly fabricated its quotation. There wasn't even a fragment of Truth to what it had told me. It was an absolute forgery, made with no concern for accuracy whatsoever, but every concern for sounding as much like a real technical answer as possible.
ReplyDeleteJust for kicks, I tried again on a couple more test questions, and got similar results.
So if you want to do some real fun with AI and textual criticism, why not devise a series of tests where you ask AI some Advanced technical questions that have real factual answers, and see just how accurate it's responses are versus how impressive they sound.
For those who don't speak German: The "faculty booklist" given as source by gemini is nothing but a random newsletter of the library listing new books acquired in November 2012.
ReplyDelete