tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post8121885437033090120..comments2024-03-29T00:57:56.876+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Kreuzer, 'Papyrus 967' (LXX 4)P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-61088887431869311532019-09-14T17:03:50.125+01:002019-09-14T17:03:50.125+01:00P.Matr.Bibl. 1 (Ezek 28:19-43:9), published as Fe...P.Matr.Bibl. 1 (Ezek 28:19-43:9), published as Fernandez Galiano, M. “Nuevas Paginas del codice 967 del A. T. griego.” Studia Papyrologica 10 (1971): 7-76., has been digitized.<br />See https://ministerioreforma.com/la-biblioteca-nacional-digitaliza-el-papiro-de-ezequiel-un-codice-del-siglo-ii/<br />John Granger Cookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06668786720580443109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-65579462724946736682012-04-10T17:55:37.493+01:002012-04-10T17:55:37.493+01:00In may paper I have given an answer to/ or maybe b...In may paper I have given an answer to/ or maybe better: discussed this question.<br />S. KreuzerSiegfried Kreuzernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-84563099524688747512010-06-24T16:28:16.268+01:002010-06-24T16:28:16.268+01:00What is the theory as to why Ezekiel, Daniel, and ...What is the theory as to why Ezekiel, Daniel, and Esther appear together in this codex? They are all "biblical diaspora" literature. Is that significant? In several of the canon lists presented by Swete (Intro. to the OT in Greek), these three books appear near each other (Daniel and Ezekiel are always paired), but I find only one time that they all three appear together without any intervening book--Codex Alexandrinus. <br /><br />Since Dr. Lilly's 2008 SBL paper was entitled "Liturgical Function", I presume that she might relate the grouping of these three books to their use in the liturgy?<br /><br />Thanks, <br />Ed GallagherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-61915082913969644402010-06-23T09:41:45.109+01:002010-06-23T09:41:45.109+01:00Thanks Ingrid for joining in. I am glad to hear yo...Thanks Ingrid for joining in. I am glad to hear you have completed your dissertation and I look forward to seeing it in print.<br /><br />Sorry all about the "Lipit-Ishtar-confusion." I guess the Ancient Near East is not my field. In this connection I was only aware of the later Code of Hammurabi. ... and, after all, Lipit-Ishtar is a name :-)Tommy Wassermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10674769923361035721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-33049182533560224122010-06-23T03:19:00.851+01:002010-06-23T03:19:00.851+01:00Any expert in ANE--and particularly Sumerian--stud...Any expert in ANE--and particularly Sumerian--studies would recognize the allusion to the Code of Lipit-Ishtar, published in 1948 by Francis Steele.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-44317282101647091052010-06-22T15:58:47.342+01:002010-06-22T15:58:47.342+01:00Hi Tommy,
Great to know about this article. ...a...Hi Tommy,<br /><br />Great to know about this article. ...and thanks for mentioning my work (I've presented several papers now at SBL on p967, in various sections.) <br /><br />I've completed my dissertation (now entitled "Papyrus 967: A Variant Literary Edition of Ezekiel,") and the codicology work has been integrated into chapter 6. I am in the process of deciding how to publish it, so I will let you know when I do. <br /><br />Also - by the way - my name remains Ingrid E. Lilly. Lipit-Ishtar is only for privacy purposes on facebook, which I use solely for personal contacts. Sorry for the confusion!Ingrid E. Lillynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-54333908266681652382010-06-22T15:04:50.568+01:002010-06-22T15:04:50.568+01:00Tommy, very interesting!
Thanks for this!Tommy, very interesting!<br />Thanks for this!Myrto Theocharoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02427889310603437461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-7637141092695537702010-06-22T15:02:32.719+01:002010-06-22T15:02:32.719+01:00Her name, by the way, is now Ingrid Esther Lipit-I...Her name, by the way, is now Ingrid Esther Lipit-Ishtar.<br /><br />Ingrid presents her dissertation project thus:<br /><br />"I am working on my Ph.D. at Emory University in Hebrew Bible. My dissertation, entitled 'Two Books of Ezekiel' is a technical project analyzing a specific Greek manuscript of Ezekiel from textual and literary perspectives. This manuscript represents an ancient, alternate edition of the biblical book of Ezekiel, possibly older than the edition we currently know as the MT, translated in all modern Bibles."<br /><br />Blog: http://ingridlilly.blogspot.com/<br /><br />I have sent her a link to this blogpost.Tommy Wassermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10674769923361035721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-80276964617939373112010-06-22T14:57:36.789+01:002010-06-22T14:57:36.789+01:00At the SBL in Boston 2008, Ingrid Lilly, Emory Uni...At the SBL in Boston 2008, Ingrid Lilly, Emory University, presented a paper on this MS:<br /><br />"Liturgical Function of p967: How Codicological Analysis Sheds Light on Textual Issues in Septuagint Ezekiel."<br /><br />It was a good paper. I was able to help her a bit in the discussion concerning the marginal comments where Π stood for ΠΕΡΙ as in P72, and this was followed by a genitive, which Ingrid had interpreted as something else. I cannot remember right now.<br /><br />I don't know whether her paper has been published anywhere. I think it was part of her dissertation project.Tommy Wassermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10674769923361035721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-7049214301734660022010-06-22T14:45:57.485+01:002010-06-22T14:45:57.485+01:00Thanks Myrto!
And thanks Peter, very, very much f...Thanks Myrto!<br /><br />And thanks Peter, very, very much for adding tags to the post ;-).Tommy Wassermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10674769923361035721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-65875372503546565752010-06-22T14:43:35.396+01:002010-06-22T14:43:35.396+01:00Eric, abbreviation of the name may have been a Jew...Eric, abbreviation of the name may have been a Jewish practice adopted by Christians. In P. Oxy. 7.1007 (=H.5) the tetragramaton is in the form of a double yod and ΘΕΟΣ in the contracted form. This papyrus was considered Jewish by P. Kahle and K. Treu. <br />The author gives epigraphic evidence for this: an inscription in Thessalonica from a Jewish or Samaritan synagogue (4th century). ΚΥΡΙΟΣ is contracted 4 times in the dedication text. Question still unresolved, I guess.<br />See the discussion in M. V. Spottorno Díaz Caro, "The Divine Name in Ezekiel Papyrus 967". Pages 213-218 in La Septuaginta en la Investigation Contemporanea. Edited by Natalio Fernández Marcos. Madrid, 1985.Myrto Theocharoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02427889310603437461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-21193250694011202822010-06-22T14:18:21.015+01:002010-06-22T14:18:21.015+01:00What is the basis for claiming that the use of nom...What is the basis for claiming that the use of nomina sacra is also a Jewish phenomenon.Eric Rowehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00559055709208918638noreply@blogger.com