tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post7255206782447208716..comments2024-03-28T15:48:18.205+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Seminar Curriculum QuestionP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-6220859861114288122009-12-11T01:19:47.535+00:002009-12-11T01:19:47.535+00:00I've uploaded the 3 images Claromontanus image...I've uploaded the 3 images Claromontanus images I got from Hansell's GNT (he has a number of plates at the end of his NT to wikipedia. They were on folded leaves, so Google's book scanner faithfully digitized the outside blank pages;). That makes 5 images total on wikipedia, 3 greek pages and 2 latin:<br /><br />http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Codex_claromontanus_greek.jpg - Rom 7:4-7 (greek)<br />http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Codex_claromontanus_latin.jpg - Rom 7:4-7 (latin)<br />http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Codex_claromontanus_2_greek.jpg - Col 1:28-2:3 (greek)<br />http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Codex_claromontanus_2_latin.jpg - Col 1:28-2:3 (latin)<br />http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Codex_claromontanus_3_greek.jpg - Col 4:17,18 (greek)<br /><br /><br />Unfortunately the Colosians pages intersects one of the common block lacunae in F & G.<br /><br />All the images are 19th century facsimilies, so not great detail:(.Bob Relyeahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13063651264391311686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-13063021650245644762009-12-09T13:01:18.534+00:002009-12-09T13:01:18.534+00:00Yes, W is definitely a possibility. I've used ...Yes, W is definitely a possibility. I've used it before (for seminars that is).Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-3301913445072305582009-12-09T00:52:53.091+00:002009-12-09T00:52:53.091+00:00Codex Washingtonus is of particular interest for i...Codex Washingtonus is of particular interest for its:<br />-block-mixing from exemplars of varying quality<br />-sole inclusion of the Freer logion<br />-affinity with p45 in Mark, with implications for the Ending<br /><br />I nominate it for week 6.Daniel Bucknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-87572816378357593282009-12-08T22:32:44.815+00:002009-12-08T22:32:44.815+00:00Thanks Bob,
That is a pretty good idea. the DFG an...Thanks Bob,<br />That is a pretty good idea. the DFG angle is a good one and there are local manuscripts involved. There must be some images of Claromontanus about. Hopefully I could find an image with some interesting variants (perhaps featuring gender issues).Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-68501224114256859292009-12-08T19:35:50.047+00:002009-12-08T19:35:50.047+00:00Week 6: What about the following related manuscrip...Week 6: What about the following related manuscripts:<br /><br />Codex Claromontanus (Dp) with Codex Sangermanensis (Dabs1) and Codex Waldeccensis (Dabs2) [of course Dabs1 and Dabs2 are copies of the Claromontanus]<br />Codex Augiensis (Fp) with Codex Boernerianus (Gp) [copies of the same exemplar, related to the Claromontanus]<br />Codex Sangallensis (Delta) [Gospel volume of the Pauline Codex Boernerianus, but with a different text type (Alexanderian in Mark, Byzantine elsewhere)].<br /><br />These are all latin diglots, and all have a family resemblence and interesting histories and textual links.<br /><br />Codex Boernerianus is available at both www.csntm.org (facsimile) and http://digital.slub-dresden.de/sammlungen/werkansicht/274591448/0/ (actual manuscript).<br /><br />Codex Augiensis is available at your nearby Trinity College library:) I know of now facsimiles or online images (would love to get some). Scrivener has a transcription that's available here: http://books.google.com/books?id=oliIQAAACAAJ&dq=Codex+Augiensis&cd=7<br /><br />Codex Sangallensis is available here:<br />http://www.cesg.unifr.ch/en/ (You want San Gallen 48)<br /><br />Codex Waldeccensis (facsimile) is available here: http://books.google.com/books?id=tAEVAAAAYAAJ&dq=Codex+Waldeccensis&source=gbs_navlinks_s<br /><br />I haven't found anything on-line for the Codex Claromontanus [rant about lack of availablility of parisian biblical manuscripts deleted], except a Hansel's 3 volume edition of the NT which includes most of the older manuscripts in parallel columns (Vaticanus, Alexandrinus, Ephraemi Syri Rescriptus, Bezae Cantabrigiensis, Claromontanus, Laudianus, and Dublinensis Rescriptus) The Claromontanus is in Volume 2.<br />Vol 1: http://www.archive.org/details/novumtestamentu07unkngoog<br />Vol 2: http://www.archive.org/details/novumtestamentu00hansgoog<br />Vol 3: http://www.archive.org/details/novumtestamentu10unkngoog<br /><br />Codex Sangermanensis - Also nothing on-line.Bob Relyeahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13063651264391311686noreply@blogger.com