tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post7164069209359765942..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Blogging at SBLP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-5902719845881067542010-02-10T11:06:16.286+00:002010-02-10T11:06:16.286+00:00I resonated with April's concerns.I resonated with April's concerns.Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-4191167235668100052010-02-10T10:19:36.342+00:002010-02-10T10:19:36.342+00:00Our blog is something of a loner entity from many ...Our blog is something of a loner entity from many others because the endeavor is well-defined (introverted?) and includes a large number of contributors. I prefer to focus on having an "SBL ETC dinner" designed to gather the lion's share of NT text critics (whether they be evangelical or not).<br /><br />You have not mentioned a fourth issue: do we need another SBL unit? Could blogging not fit within one of the technology units? Many units are poorly attended already. <a href="http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2009/11/open-letter-about-sbl.html" rel="nofollow">April Deconick has commented on the dangers of SBL unit proliferation</a>, and I am sure that she is not the first. Personally, I agree with DeConick and would rather have my paper rejected than present at a session with few attendees.Christian Askelandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09381441700351009913noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-6389308374597717862010-02-09T17:48:34.287+00:002010-02-09T17:48:34.287+00:00Yes, OK, I added the third at a late redactional s...Yes, OK, I added the third at a late redactional stage. Search for the seams.Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.com