tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post7132986565069392298..comments2024-03-28T15:48:18.205+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Textual Examples Wherein MT and the Jewish Revisions DifferP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-17296420877637572292018-03-20T20:49:15.255+00:002018-03-20T20:49:15.255+00:00Yep, what Dirk said :-).Yep, what Dirk said :-).John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-14563030256164913292018-03-20T18:48:16.088+00:002018-03-20T18:48:16.088+00:00Thank you so much, Dirk. Very significant.Thank you so much, Dirk. Very significant.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03768264208772041380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-43599245590460721932018-03-19T12:09:52.048+00:002018-03-19T12:09:52.048+00:00Look here http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogs...Look here http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/matthew-215-and-hexapla.htmlDirk Jongkindhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06759927266909478390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-27014282600050337182018-03-19T11:58:29.788+00:002018-03-19T11:58:29.788+00:00Is there any support from Theodotion, Aquila, Sym...Is there any support from Theodotion, Aquila, Symmachus to Matthew gospel regarding Hosea 11.1? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03768264208772041380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-64038233878643137532018-03-14T17:20:22.245+00:002018-03-14T17:20:22.245+00:00Well, the MT may still be older/more original. I h...Well, the MT may still be older/more original. I haven't decided between readings here. I only wanted to note that there are some differences between the Three and MT (more if we kept cataloguing :-)).John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-16885720745415392352018-03-14T17:18:38.540+00:002018-03-14T17:18:38.540+00:00In 53:8, yes. But the Three do not agree with it e...In 53:8, yes. But the Three do not agree with it either. I don't remember for 3:12, but I don't think so.John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-35599377825794247972018-03-14T16:21:28.405+00:002018-03-14T16:21:28.405+00:00Thank you!Thank you!Clark Bateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263824081417055814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-43908405378195681942018-03-14T16:20:12.650+00:002018-03-14T16:20:12.650+00:00Same goes for comparing to Jerome, who dealt with ...Same goes for comparing to Jerome, who dealt with a proto MT of sorts from what I know...<br /><br />So much for the supposed purity of the MT. Go LXX (I feel like a salesman lol.. this might be my 3rd post doing that). It certainly shouldn't be discounted as much as it has.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-28266155876743759802018-03-14T16:00:34.189+00:002018-03-14T16:00:34.189+00:00Are there any variants to the MT Isaiah reading in...Are there any variants to the MT Isaiah reading in the Isaiah Scrolls?Daniel Buckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02600146498880358592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-50344388870875374732018-03-14T15:24:09.145+00:002018-03-14T15:24:09.145+00:00Thanks, Joel. It's a great question but I'...Thanks, Joel. It's a great question but I'm not sure of the answer. It seems date and provenance of the translations would be key factors; that is, we need to be careful we are not reading earlier Greek translations in the light of later rabbinic exegesis.John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-44330432441939414852018-03-14T15:14:10.833+00:002018-03-14T15:14:10.833+00:00This was very helpful. As a tangential question: d...This was very helpful. As a tangential question: do you have any strong evidence for rabbinic exegesis elsewhere in the OG? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02872001604337708718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-59998621224789125322018-03-14T14:55:22.330+00:002018-03-14T14:55:22.330+00:00I haven't. Tough book to get a hold of (https:...I haven't. Tough book to get a hold of (https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/162859243?q&versionId=177482534), but Peter Gentry's essay "The Son of Man in Daniel 7: individual or corporate?" might be what you are looking for. Let me know if this helps.John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-32066004617726193692018-03-14T14:50:55.142+00:002018-03-14T14:50:55.142+00:00John, have you ever written on the variation betwe...John, have you ever written on the variation between Theodotion and the OG in Daniel 7? I'm particularly curious about the conflating of the son of man with the ancient of days.<br /><br />Your article here seems to touch on similar issues. <br /><br />Thank you for the contribution!Clark Bateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263824081417055814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-58017744656467725522018-03-14T14:38:04.611+00:002018-03-14T14:38:04.611+00:00Thanks, Timothy. Glad you think so.Thanks, Timothy. Glad you think so.John Meadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258579581521365645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-45186520757164163522018-03-14T14:31:06.106+00:002018-03-14T14:31:06.106+00:00Thanks for this John. Very enlightening. Thanks for this John. Very enlightening. Timothy N. Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10696299768205488795noreply@blogger.com