tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post6065075549609591959..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Postdoc in Lausanne on Mark 16P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-70309158262764768632018-09-10T14:52:31.735+01:002018-09-10T14:52:31.735+01:00Yep.Yep.Peter Malikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00270874379279604671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-53085881623431046052018-09-06T09:11:16.930+01:002018-09-06T09:11:16.930+01:00The intersection between digital and traditional h...The intersection between digital and traditional humanities will be the nexus for creativity. Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-33555331192264037932018-09-05T18:28:40.294+01:002018-09-05T18:28:40.294+01:00Well, there is a little bit of new patristic testi...Well, there is a little bit of new patristic testimony: Fortunatianus (in the mid-300s) alludes to Mark's mention of Jesus' ascension in his Gospels-commentary, and seems to make use of Mark 16:20, as I report at http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/search?q=Fortunatianus . But nothing that would need four years to analyze.<br /> James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-87887243231267533322018-09-05T17:59:16.686+01:002018-09-05T17:59:16.686+01:00Also on the opposing side are Kelhoffer's Mira...Also on the opposing side are Kelhoffer's <i>Miracle and Mission</i> as well as virtually every scholarly commentary on Mark (whether by liberals or conservatives), including older works dating back to the 19th century -- so I also wonder what further developments could possibly arise from such position. With no new manuscripts, patristic testimony, or versional evidence that would affect the issue, this seems more like reinventing the wheel than anything else. Maurice A. Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685965674144539571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-18811452738572394222018-09-05T10:22:17.653+01:002018-09-05T10:22:17.653+01:00From 2007 to now, we've got (1) the "Pers...From 2007 to now, we've got (1) the "Perspectives on the Ending of Mark" book, (2) Nicholas Lunn's "The Original Ending of Mark," and (3) my book, "Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20." Just what discoveries are left to be made? Quite a few commentators are not paying attention to what is already available.James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.com