tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post2869944159484935270..comments2024-03-29T00:57:56.876+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: 13,000 new images onlineP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-71237130471612355162009-07-08T19:44:49.280+01:002009-07-08T19:44:49.280+01:00Daniel, yes I think so, though I can't decide ...Daniel, yes I think so, though I can't decide the ink colour of the dots. Generally, I don't think critics could demonstrate the age of dots, but I could see a thin style of the dots, not reasonable in comparison with the thick form of the text itself. This may indicates another scribe put the dots, especially that there are many places must have dots, but there isn't!Fady A. Mekhaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15234269416145918451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-27266815650046455712009-07-08T17:56:33.913+01:002009-07-08T17:56:33.913+01:00What about all the reddish-orange dots, Fadie? Do ...What about all the reddish-orange dots, Fadie? Do you think they were added by a later hand?Daniel Bucknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-88942572928784678002009-07-08T12:06:22.016+01:002009-07-08T12:06:22.016+01:00This is a very old Arabic form without dots, thoug...This is a very old Arabic form without dots, though it could be read. There is an accurate index for the images:<br /><br />http://vmr.bham.ac.uk/Collections/Mingana/Islamic_Arabic_1572/documents/Mingana%20Islamic%20Arabic%201572%20%5Bcat%20vol%20IV%5D.pdfFady A. Mekhaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15234269416145918451noreply@blogger.com