tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post2521586371231648861..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Putting the Distigmai in Their Place: Payne Strikes Back pt. 4P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-82766746492855395872010-02-01T18:01:50.619+00:002010-02-01T18:01:50.619+00:00Payne, "Why would Head include Erasmus’s Lati...Payne, "Why would Head include Erasmus’s Latin text as a basis for identifying Greek textual variants? ... the only text of Erasmus that is relevant is his Greek text. It makes no sense to compare Erasmus’s Latin text to find textual variants between Erasmus’s Greek text and Vaticanus."<br /><br />The Vulgate may not be as important to us as the Greek mss, but it was certainly very important to Erasmus and de Sepulveda, and to most Christian scholars of the 16th c.C. E. Hillnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-84691706640430683102010-02-01T10:42:49.016+00:002010-02-01T10:42:49.016+00:00Thanks to Philip for this. If we recall that the S...Thanks to Philip for this. If we recall that the SBL presentation was a 20 minute presentation on the subject of the marginalia this might explain why he hasn't been able to fully grasp an entirely different argument of which only the conclusions and none of the evidence was reported. Once the data is published the force of this argument will be able to be assessed.Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.com