tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post828395520238356882..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: A Day in OxfordP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-3415546189254623992008-09-24T12:21:00.000+01:002008-09-24T12:21:00.000+01:00true, but omission due to doctrinal reasons is sti...true, but omission due to doctrinal reasons is still an option. Or we have two different versions of Luke's gospel (my personal view).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-37705394736383558252008-09-24T11:26:00.000+01:002008-09-24T11:26:00.000+01:00I had a short look at the article and (oh man!), M...I had a short look at the article and (oh man!), MAQHTAS is now so obvious! <BR/>Why did nobody else found that before? No multi-sprectral imaging is necessary to see that. <BR/><BR/>Preliminary conclusion: <BR/>P69 omits vss 42-44, not 45a. <BR/>Omission due to parablepsis is no option anymore now.Wieland Willkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02376942788228063430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-33553674261726623452008-09-23T17:33:00.000+01:002008-09-23T17:33:00.000+01:00I'm not sure I'm equally convinced by all of Wayme...I'm not sure I'm equally convinced by all of Wayment's re-readings. Anyone else had a look?Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-20501239594210934532008-09-23T17:21:00.000+01:002008-09-23T17:21:00.000+01:00Ah, I may have to go back for another look.Ah, I may have to go back for another look.Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-29626157235504267122008-09-23T16:14:00.000+01:002008-09-23T16:14:00.000+01:00Re P69: the latest number of Novum Testamentum has...Re P69: the latest number of Novum Testamentum has an article on P69:<BR/>Thomas A. Wynant, "A New Transcription of P. Oxy 2383 (P69)" NovT 50.4 (2008) 351-7. The article includes new multi-sprectral photographs, which show up very nicely online.<BR/>MichaelMike Holmeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01282608301480952555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-6489882057088924432008-09-23T15:20:00.000+01:002008-09-23T15:20:00.000+01:00OK. I've adjusted the post! (for identification an...OK. I've adjusted the post! (for identification and spelling)Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-3740276470735696032008-09-23T15:05:00.000+01:002008-09-23T15:05:00.000+01:00PS Please spell Tolkien right!GPS Please spell Tolkien right!<BR/><BR/>GAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-82627196910898116292008-09-23T14:54:00.000+01:002008-09-23T14:54:00.000+01:00I'm intrigued by your desire to preserve my anonym...I'm intrigued by your desire to preserve my anonymity, Peter!<BR/><BR/>Gathers <BR/>a.k.a. "Another ETC blogger"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-16828852906562945322008-09-23T14:45:00.000+01:002008-09-23T14:45:00.000+01:00Happy day! I am jealous. Eagle and Child was a r...Happy day! I am jealous. Eagle and Child was a regular when I lived in Oxford; it's usefully right next to the Theology Faculty building. One of the nice things about that Synoptic Problem conference in April was getting a chance to go back there again.Mark Goodacrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.com