tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post8154547596899044388..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Textual Criticism and ProvenanceP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-3674591904102515922008-08-19T12:28:00.000+01:002008-08-19T12:28:00.000+01:00I presume this refers to the subscription in some ...I presume this refers to the subscription in some mss in which 'from Rome' appears in various forms:<BR/>'to Colossians written from Rome' (A B1 P pc)<BR/>'to Colossians written from Rome through Tychichus and Onesimus' (075 1739 1881 Maj)<BR/>'the epistle of Paul the Apostle to Colossians written from Rome through Tychichus' (0278).Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-28538343096862463892008-08-17T12:24:00.000+01:002008-08-17T12:24:00.000+01:00Could you, please supply the full reference to Met...Could you, please supply the full reference to Metzger.<BR/><BR/>In addition, the "Marcionite" prologues are very likely not Marcionite in origin, see N.A. Dahl, The Origin of the Earliest Prologues to the Pauline Letters, Semeia 12, 1978, 233-277. At least a "so-called" should be the minimum qualifier of "Marcionite" in this respect.<BR/><BR/>Ulrich SchmidAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com