tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post7864456643232237803..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Thomas Kraus on Luke 14.5 and What We Need in Our Critical EditionsP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-54463947209706927682015-06-18T20:14:04.055+01:002015-06-18T20:14:04.055+01:00Answering my own question, I guess they would have...Answering my own question, I guess they would have to say that at some point those majuscules were copied from an exemplar that displayed YC with the supralinear line, and instead of perpetuating the nomina sacra, they spelled YIOC out fully. Is that likely? I had thought usage of nomen sacrum tended to grow and not shrink throughout the centuries?Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05514916694063974131noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-19026659933540652642015-06-18T18:54:47.216+01:002015-06-18T18:54:47.216+01:0002, 03 and 032 all have YIOC fully spelled out. So...02, 03 and 032 all have YIOC fully spelled out. So if YC (pig) was the original, how did it become YIOC, then become YC with the supralinear line?Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05514916694063974131noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-72369051462565392952015-06-17T18:48:23.184+01:002015-06-17T18:48:23.184+01:00Obviously ὗς would be the lectio difficilior if i...Obviously ὗς would be the <i>lectio difficilior</i> if it ever could be shown to be an actual <i>lectio</i> as opposed to a bald conjecture. <br /><br />Even were that the case, such a reading still would not overcome the greater difficulty of historical credibility within a Jewish theological perspective. As it stands, the only reading that truly is "more difficult" in the context is υιος.Maurice A. Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685965674144539571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-83564743786101879252015-06-17T14:35:53.080+01:002015-06-17T14:35:53.080+01:00Yet, isn't this an example where the lectio di...Yet, isn't this an example where the lectio difficilior so difficult that we should not accept it? <br /><br />TimArchepoimenfollowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04498234518466096416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-54845186738547663782015-06-16T22:48:42.934+01:002015-06-16T22:48:42.934+01:00And so the lectio difficilior as Kraus suggests (i...And so the <em>lectio difficilior</em> as Kraus suggests (if I'm remembering right).Peter Gurryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10396444437216746412noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-14098504801155413772015-06-16T21:15:54.697+01:002015-06-16T21:15:54.697+01:00There seems to be a multilinear erasure near the e...There seems to be a multilinear erasure near the end of the line; βου̣ς and ευθεω̣ς are vid. at best.Daniel Buckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02600146498880358592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-61092185875518995132015-06-16T19:32:11.422+01:002015-06-16T19:32:11.422+01:00The conjectural ὗς seems quite unlikely given the ...The conjectural ὗς seems quite unlikely given the illustrative and exemplary context of the statement, being made to <i>Jewish</i> lawyers and Pharisees (Lk 14.3) -- none of whom would be likely even to own a pig, let alone have any major concern about rescuing such.Maurice A. Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685965674144539571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-41022141751168411702015-06-16T19:16:19.965+01:002015-06-16T19:16:19.965+01:00Isn't it obvious that the word is supposed to ...Isn't it obvious that the word is supposed to be an animal and not a son? I mean the point of the statement is that these guys care more about animals than people, so how could son be right? It surprising looking at the translations on biblegateway.com, how many of them actually say son. Face palm.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07057420131874808027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-19430953806244675822015-06-16T14:17:51.170+01:002015-06-16T14:17:51.170+01:00I'd like to see more context for that photoI'd like to see more context for that photoPeter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.com