tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post7176892759969551699..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Mystery MSP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-55367041084352602292009-05-31T00:55:41.980+01:002009-05-31T00:55:41.980+01:00Answer:
http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=475Answer:<br /><br />http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=475mwhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08202670246362616005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-75116573919409785902009-05-30T18:00:44.630+01:002009-05-30T18:00:44.630+01:00Yeah, this one was too easy. My first guess would ...Yeah, this one was too easy. My first guess would have been Oxyrhynchus Papyrus #52.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-49685527235057607752009-05-30T15:49:34.426+01:002009-05-30T15:49:34.426+01:00Looks like Mike beat me to it. ;)Looks like Mike beat me to it. ;)Shaun Tabatthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16632777725443926426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-63479862742585705432009-05-30T01:31:11.263+01:002009-05-30T01:31:11.263+01:00Well, at least all this notice shows that you can'...Well, at least all this notice shows that you can't sneak a wrong identification past textual critics. :-) Thanks, Mike (and Rodney Decker and others).<br /><br />I suppose the intention was to put a picture of P52 on p. 16 as well as p. 442. POxy52 is not relevant to the purposes of the textbook. That would explain the text below the picture. Then someone pulled up the wrong image somehow. Why did they go to Glasgow for the image??!! They would have had to ask for permissions, etc. That's kind of embarrassing. Or am I missing some connection that would have made it an easy mistake?Amy Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14380186448771079820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-81502733561307027062009-05-30T00:09:39.058+01:002009-05-30T00:09:39.058+01:00will those who have the erroneous edition get a re...will those who have the erroneous edition get a refund or a new corrected copy?<br /><br />(i don't have one- i'm just wondering how they will make it right)Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16698562143972216357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-75178362635410218112009-05-29T23:14:06.604+01:002009-05-29T23:14:06.604+01:00Here's your answer:
http://rdtwot.wordpress.com/2...Here's your answer:<br /><br />http://rdtwot.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/papyri-mix-up/<br /><br />You were really, really close.<br /><br />Zondervan already knows of the error and is fixing it in future printings.Mike Aubreyhttp://evepheso.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-17743815790730242092009-05-29T22:55:19.543+01:002009-05-29T22:55:19.543+01:00Now that it is posted, I see that you can click on...Now that it is posted, I see that you can click on the picture and get a great look at the fragment, better than I could get in the textbook. (I need to purchase a magnifying glass for my old eyes.)<br /><br />I can even decipher some of the words now, and might get a chance to come back for a closer look in a few days. But if someone else can beat me to it - go right ahead. :-)Amy Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14380186448771079820noreply@blogger.com