tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post6082576638782005621..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Williams on the Long Ending of MarkP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-34572130032619406592017-07-18T06:00:03.894+01:002017-07-18T06:00:03.894+01:00if the offer is still available, you can mail it t...if the offer is still available, you can mail it to my office at 10130 Rosedale Hwy. Bakersfield CA 93312. <br />Jovan Payeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06599454229314682328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-45709528922738676262016-05-11T15:35:42.179+01:002016-05-11T15:35:42.179+01:00Jovan Payes,
I'll do better than that, and se...Jovan Payes, <br />I'll do better than that, and send you a free copy of the new 2016 edition of the full research-book itself.<br />James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-26937131436612564332016-05-11T09:39:18.665+01:002016-05-11T09:39:18.665+01:00Is that offer to share your research on "A br...Is that offer to share your research on "A brief Defense"? If so, I'd like to read it (jovan.payes@gmail.com)Jovan Payeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06599454229314682328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-23294151811186339292010-10-08T22:18:13.168+01:002010-10-08T22:18:13.168+01:00It appears the 2010 issue is not posted on the int...It appears the 2010 issue is not posted on the internet link. Could there be another online source?<br /><br />regards,<br />NazarooNazaroohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03584331774685466296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-7025362087167096812010-10-06T03:00:11.428+01:002010-10-06T03:00:11.428+01:00I may try to track this article down someday. In ...I may try to track this article down someday. In the meantime, this might be a good opportunity to mention that I've written a summarized 15-page defense of Mark 16:9-20 as part of the autograph of the Gospel of Mark, boiling down my earlier 160-page paper. It's called "A Brief Defense of Mark 16:9-20" and I'd be glad to share it on request via e-mail, or, if you like, it can be purchased cheap as a Kindle Book at Amazon. <br /><br />Does Williams ask, "Is Mark 16:9-20 the ending intended by Mark?" or does he merely ask, "Do stylistic considerations allow the possibility that the author of Mark 1:1-16:8 could be the author of 16:9-20 if 16:9-20 is considered a separate document?"<br /><br />And does he include Kelhoffer's analysis among the previous discussions that have been methodologically unsound?<br /><br />Yours in Christ,<br /><br />James Snapp, Jr.James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.com