tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post4745137231843709108..comments2024-03-28T15:48:18.205+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Daniel Wallace reviews NA28P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-77697740253548730862013-01-04T03:14:04.447+00:002013-01-04T03:14:04.447+00:00I just received the NA28 / ESV that I ordered from...I just received the NA28 / ESV that I ordered from Amazon. In going through the list of changes to the text, I was intrigued by the one for 2 Pe 3:10 where "be exposed" is now "not be exposed". The apparatus only shows evidence from versions for this reading and none from manuscripts. I wonder if this change will be controversial. What is the basis for this change?Brian Jonesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-27798780925523089792012-12-18T21:11:55.901+00:002012-12-18T21:11:55.901+00:00My primary issue with the NA28 apparatus is the ap...My primary issue with the NA28 apparatus is the apparent total disappearance of <i>"pc"</i> and <i>"al"</i> from the variant readings cited. <br /><br />This makes it appear as though <i>only</i> those MSS specifically cited testify to a given variant, when in fact there may be several or even dozens of other MSS supporting such readings. Some correction of this defect should be considered for future printings of NA28. maurice a robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06207682737855397058noreply@blogger.com