tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post3073857742855443268..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Romans 5:15-16 Question mark?P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-7898642744540717392008-01-16T19:57:00.000+00:002008-01-16T19:57:00.000+00:00In the same vein, Romans 8:33-34 should be puctuat...In the same vein, Romans 8:33-34 should be puctuated to read:<BR/>Who will bring a charge against God's elect--God, who justifies?<BR/><BR/>Who condemns--Christ, who died? No, in fact he was raised and is at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us.<BR/><BR/>This fits these 2 verses into the rhetorical pattern of 8:31-37.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-84617857991812294442008-01-16T00:09:00.000+00:002008-01-16T00:09:00.000+00:00His big book does not discuss the passage beyond p...His big book does not discuss the passage beyond providing a foonote reference to the <I>NTS</I> article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-12738871528100920122008-01-15T21:54:00.000+00:002008-01-15T21:54:00.000+00:00I'll have to see if Dr. Caragounis discusses this ...I'll have to see if Dr. Caragounis discusses this in his big book (in which he discusses several different renderings of Biblical passages). I don't see it discussed on <A HREF="http://www.lsn.se/2509/index.htm" REL="nofollow">his Website</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com