tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post2668780129493496806..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Meet P132 and P133, Ephesians and 1 TimothyP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-83984985208404902352018-01-09T17:24:54.013+00:002018-01-09T17:24:54.013+00:00Many thanks for this, Peter. I am preparing a revi...Many thanks for this, Peter. I am preparing a review of this Oxyrhynchus volume for The Classical Review and P133 particularly caught my attention. Brice C. Jones has posted the transcription from the ed.pr. for P133 (and P132): https://www.bricecjones.com/blog/two-new-greek-new-testament-papyri-from-oxyrhynchus. Also, there is some backstory: http://ncunortherner.com/2014/04/two-students-professor-awarded-trip-oxford-study-ancient-greek-manuscripts/.Patrick Jameshttps://cambridge.academia.edu/PatrickJamesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-61850534317237380432017-05-03T03:00:37.147+01:002017-05-03T03:00:37.147+01:00In this case, "recto" means codicologica...In this case, "recto" means codicological recto, likewise verso. We know which came first because the content is known. There is no real reason to use the fiber direction instead of recto / verso, except in a discussion of the layout of the codex. Turner's injunction against pap. recto / verso should be taken as applying to documents, book rolls, or fragmentary literature where we cannot tell which side preceeded the other.GW Schwendnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07538111759786728943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-68744866715622613032017-05-02T18:43:27.067+01:002017-05-02T18:43:27.067+01:00Hmm the 2 manuscripts in question for lines 2 and ...Hmm the 2 manuscripts in question for lines 2 and 27 are Codex Boernerianus (Gp, 012) and Codex Augiensis (Fp, 010). There are also other agreements with G and F against Codex Claromontanus (Dp, 06). Given the very close relationship between these latin/greek diglots, it may be worth checking if these are just random permutations or if there is a genetic relationship between this manuscript and the common ancestor of F and G. If so it may be worth redoing the reconstruction with F and G in mind.Bob Relyeahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13063651264391311686noreply@blogger.com