tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post242650458509553802..comments2024-03-28T00:45:18.442+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: 036: A nice looking Oxford late majusculeP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-9246674709558653832020-11-23T18:59:20.783+00:002020-11-23T18:59:20.783+00:00Min. 251 has a few other variants here too (insert...Min. 251 has a few other variants here too (insert Ἰ(ησοῦ)ς after δὲ; add τοῦ Θ(εο)ῦ after ὁ υἱὸς).stewalchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454323945956862607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-46285286994644901632020-11-23T18:56:03.557+00:002020-11-23T18:56:03.557+00:00Interestingly NA27 also notes Φ pc as agreeing wit...Interestingly NA27 also notes Φ pc as agreeing with Γ/k, both of which have not been repeated in NA28 (pc and al have been removed for some reasons; see NA28 intro p. 5* / 49*). There's some images of the manuscript online at the CSNTM however: http://www.csntm.org/manuscript/View/GA_043 , however based on the thumbnail on the INTF, this page is not on CSNTM (shame).<br /><br />Min. 251 is also on CSNTM: http://www.csntm.org/manuscript/View/GA_251 , which if you search for Mark 14:61, should come up (top line of left-hand page on Image ID 289122), and can confirm this does indeed omit ὁ χριστός :)stewalchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454323945956862607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-86384772575260228822020-11-23T17:17:58.640+00:002020-11-23T17:17:58.640+00:00According to Von Soden, this omission occurs also ...According to Von Soden, this omission occurs also in <br />Φ=20043 (: INTF has no pictures, Transkription is conjecture).<br />INTF 30251-2560 (checked that, is ok).<br /><br />Jülicher Vetus Latina Africana e has "tu es filius benedicti": (omitting Xristus).<br /><br />Von Soden is still an important source for finding Variants. A bit cumborsome in handling, but together with the Kurzgefasste Liste, one can easily trace the Mss and check them in the INTF Manuscript-Pictures.Jean Putmanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09156196111740868436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-56196061015316008402020-11-23T16:20:00.843+00:002020-11-23T16:20:00.843+00:00Transcription for those who may have difficulty re...Transcription for those who may have difficulty reading the type of Majuscule writing there:<br /><br />τυροῦσιν· ὁ δὲ ἐσιώπα καὶ οὐδὲν ἀ<br />πεκρίνατο· πάλιν ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς ἐπη<br />ρώτα αὐτὸν καὶ λέγει αὐτῶ· σὺ εἶ <br />ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ εὐλογητοῦ; ὁ δὲ Ἰ(ησοῦ)ς εἶπεν,<br />ἐγώ εἰμι· καὶ ὄψεσθε τὸν υἱὸν τ(οῦ)<br />ἀν(θρώπ)ου εκ δεξιῶν καθήμενον τῆς<br />δυνάμεως· καὶ ἐρχόμενον μετὰ<br />τῶν νεφελῶν τοῦ οὐ(ρα)νοῦ· ὁ δὲ ἀρχιε<br /> ρεὺς<br /><br />The case of omitting ὁ χριστός be a simple case of homoeoarchon? [ὁ] χριστός [ὁ] υἱὸςstewalchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454323945956862607noreply@blogger.com