tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post1422239140401266240..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: The Missing Manuscript and the Case of Variant BoundariesP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-75352807898160178642015-05-07T09:07:38.628+01:002015-05-07T09:07:38.628+01:00I agree with the comments, C reads the normal read...I agree with the comments, C reads the normal reading here. I came to this variant on the basis of Legg, so I 'knew' what C was reading (οστις δ απ-...) and therefore 'saw' this reading as clear as I could possibly imagine. Pleasantly surprised that life can be simpler on close examination than I make it to be.Dirk Jongkindhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06759927266909478390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-43037382601271955222015-05-07T07:44:46.191+01:002015-05-07T07:44:46.191+01:00I agree with Maurice.
C reads δ'αν αρνησηται
...I agree with Maurice. <br />C reads δ'αν αρνησηται<br />This fits to C being basically Byzantine in Mt. <br /><br />οστις δε appears two more times in Mt, but nowhere else in the Greek Bible. <br />It is possible that δε has been changed into δ'αν to avoid Hiatus. <br />Wieland Willkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02376942788228063430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-40650657017618055022015-05-07T07:31:27.512+01:002015-05-07T07:31:27.512+01:00On page 404 of Lyons' thesis, under the title ...On page 404 of Lyons' thesis, under the title "Errors in Tischendorf's Edition of the Original Text of Codex C", is noted:<br /><br />[Matthew] 10.33 - δ αν αρνησηται , not δ απαρνησηται<br />Tony Popenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-33910894261012933852015-05-06T19:28:18.972+01:002015-05-06T19:28:18.972+01:00I am puzzled.
Looking at the photo blown up larg...I am puzzled. <br /><br />Looking at the photo blown up larger (by opening in a new tab and clicking on it again), it appears clear to me that the underlying text of C reads οστις δ αν αρνησηται. <br /><br />The slant line of the Nu is clearly visible, and what might make one think it a Pi appears merely a part of the overwriting. <br /><br />Either way, there is no δε present as opposed to δ αν. So basically the NA27/28 apparatuses (read negatively as they must) remain correct in considering C to read with the main NA/UBS critical text here.Maurice A. Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685965674144539571noreply@blogger.com