tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post1332354723673434676..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: New fragment of 1 Peter (P. Oxy 4934)P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-72540625538286192982009-08-11T17:41:07.688+01:002009-08-11T17:41:07.688+01:00The date was as given on the Oxy web site (linked ...The date was as given on the Oxy web site (linked to the pictures).<br /><br />I have only seen the published version briefly (Walter Cockle had a copy at the Sinaiticus conference and I snatched a look). It hasn't arrived in the library here yet. (In any case I doubt it would be appropriate to post it online).Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-50884085010855865562009-08-10T15:28:34.053+01:002009-08-10T15:28:34.053+01:00Would it be possible to post the entire entry of P...Would it be possible to post the entire entry of P Oxy 4934 from the latest Oxyrhynchus volume?Peter Rodgershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07354679824982098241noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-40905889051953989592009-08-08T17:56:30.351+01:002009-08-08T17:56:30.351+01:00The base text I used was NA27.
Steven WhatleyThe base text I used was NA27.<br /><br />Steven WhatleySteven Whatleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09307741256832083965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-21151989721114080592009-08-08T17:55:10.512+01:002009-08-08T17:55:10.512+01:00I collated the fragment after Peter Head posted it...I collated the fragment after Peter Head posted it. Here are the variant readings I noted in the first collation (lacunae outside these variants not noted here). <br /><br />recto<br />2:1 pasa ] .s.un<br />2:2 gala ] gela<br />2:3 autw ] autwn<br />2:3 egeusasthe ] eu.sasthe. (only parts of "sasthe" are visible in line 15 and there may be a letter between "u" and "s" depending on the positioning of the right hand fragment, but "eg" is clearly absent before "eu")<br />2:3 xrhstos o kurios ] [xs o ks] (from the "e" in eusasthe (2:3) to the "p" in proserxomenoi (2:4) there are 19 letters using the nomina sacra - the text is lacunose, but at about 23 letters per line on average, the full spelling will not fit)<br />2:4 thew ] thw (nomin sacrum)<br /><br /><br />verso<br />2:8 proskoptousin ] [pr]o[s]k.o.pso.u.[sin] ( pi tau ] psi )<br />2:10 laos(1) ] OM<br />2:10 theou ] thu (nomin sacrum)<br />2:12 tois ] OM<br /><br /><br /><br />As is the nature of collating, if anyone has a different take on any of the readings I noted, please let me know. I will be glad to have a second collation to reconcile with the one I have.<br /><br />Thank you, Dr. Head, for posting these. It is always exciting to work with something new. <br /><br /><br /><br />In Christ,<br />Steven WhatleySteven Whatleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09307741256832083965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-83815921316687150402009-08-08T16:42:21.872+01:002009-08-08T16:42:21.872+01:00Any noted variation from the UBS/NA?Any noted variation from the UBS/NA?Timo Flinknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-79165445719217549112009-08-07T23:16:58.254+01:002009-08-07T23:16:58.254+01:00Who gave this a late 3rd early 4th date?
Do other...Who gave this a late 3rd early 4th date?<br /><br />Do others on this site agree?<br /><br />Looks a lot earlier to me!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com