tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post116794153743687145..comments2024-03-28T15:48:18.205+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Tim Finney's bookP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1168964125224013462007-01-16T16:15:00.000+00:002007-01-16T16:15:00.000+00:00Thanks for your comment, Stephen. It prompted me t...Thanks for your comment, Stephen. It prompted me to change the last paragraph of chapter two.Tim Finneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06917702868418937025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1168457663073599992007-01-10T19:34:00.000+00:002007-01-10T19:34:00.000+00:00That's an interesting project and I'd like to see ...That's an interesting project and I'd like to see it continued.<BR/><BR/>I'm concerned, however, a bit by the terminology: asking whether two witnesses are "related."<BR/><BR/>For example, all manuscripts of Hebrews are related to each other, though to various degrees, because they are all descendents of the same archetype. On the other hand, a manuscript of Luke and one of Hebrews would not be related.<BR/><BR/>But that's not really the concept that Tim Finney's book is getting at.Stephen C. Carlsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18239379955876245197noreply@blogger.com