tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post114008628858897350..comments2024-03-17T17:46:24.354+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: Ehrman, Whose Word Is It?P.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140815462920270572006-02-24T21:11:00.000+00:002006-02-24T21:11:00.000+00:00Paul, I generally concur with your assessment. I'v...Paul, I generally concur with your assessment. I've added a few comments below your post on your own blog.P.J. Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140796831375196132006-02-24T16:00:00.000+00:002006-02-24T16:00:00.000+00:00I'd be honored to have any of you fellows take a l...I'd be honored to have any of you fellows take a look at <A HREF="http://pspruett.blogspot.com/2006/02/presupposing-perfection-bart-ehrman.html" REL="nofollow">this post</A> I've just completed, which deconstructs Ehrman's presupposition regarding the need of perfect transmission of the text in order to a divine inspiration. If my thinking is off-base I'd appreciate any corrections/suggestions, since this is slated for publication at LifeWay.com. Thanks.Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11853366401521123552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140515779833889492006-02-21T09:56:00.000+00:002006-02-21T09:56:00.000+00:00I can sympathise with Ehrman. There are, after all...I can sympathise with Ehrman. There are, after all, more people who would have something to say about his work than he could manage to answer in the time he has.<BR/><BR/>The best way for someone busy to offer such interaction is through an hour-long live e-mail chat.P.J. Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140457683965846452006-02-20T17:48:00.000+00:002006-02-20T17:48:00.000+00:00Obviously "Whose Word Is It?" = "Misquoting Jesus"...Obviously "Whose Word Is It?" = "Misquoting Jesus" with a different title.<BR/><BR/>As some here know,Dr. Ehrman recently visited Wieland Willker's textualcriticism list during a discussion of Mark 1:41. Then he seemed to disappear. I sure would like to discuss the texts that he focused on in "Misquoting Jesus" with him, in a quoteable forum, so as to make more obvious the important details that were left out of his readers' line of sight in "Misquoting Jesus." Dr. Ehrman is probably too busy for such a discussion, though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140103684161342842006-02-16T15:28:00.000+00:002006-02-16T15:28:00.000+00:00Perhaps they will bring down the price of manuscri...Perhaps they will bring down the price of manuscripts.P.J. Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140102296457096212006-02-16T15:04:00.000+00:002006-02-16T15:04:00.000+00:00Tesco's as a scholarly resource - what will they t...Tesco's as a scholarly resource - what will they think of next?Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1140092822748226492006-02-16T12:27:00.000+00:002006-02-16T12:27:00.000+00:00"The upside-down Hebrew letters are bigger"Opps, t..."The upside-down Hebrew letters are bigger"<BR/><BR/>Opps, that was supposed to be the cover for "Lost In Transmission: The Story behind who changed the Old Testament, and Why."<BR/><BR/>How about some backwards Greek letters, viewed through the reverse of a palimpset under UV-2 backlighting?The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.com