tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post113690679668339352..comments2024-03-29T07:11:17.775+00:00Comments on Evangelical Textual Criticism: D, F, and G in the PastoralsP.J. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04388225485348300613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1136952784996480732006-01-11T04:13:00.000+00:002006-01-11T04:13:00.000+00:00Outside of Marcion and Epp's view of P46 (I follow...Outside of Marcion and Epp's view of P46 (I follow Duff, by the way), is there really any other evidence of a different transmission history of the Pastorals from the rest of the Corpus Paulinum?<BR/><BR/>The evidence of D, F, and G, as you point out suggests the opposite, and I would tend to agree.Stephen C. Carlsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18239379955876245197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859011.post-1136932716644584162006-01-10T22:38:00.000+00:002006-01-10T22:38:00.000+00:00D (06) is Codex Claromontanus, a complete set of P...D (06) is Codex Claromontanus, a complete set of Paul (as supplemented by Dabs1). Its Gospels counterpart is Bezae (D 05).<BR/>F (10) (supplemented by f)has all the Pauline epistles except Romans 1-3:19. Gospels counterpart is F 09.<BR/>G (12) is virtually identical to F, but interlinear rather than parallel.Gospels counterpart is G 11.<BR/>How confusing, to have completely different mss called by the same letter name, just because they are all Western diglots. And in the middle of these all are Ee 07 and Ea 08 (also a diglot) which have nothing in common other than both being classed as Byzantine!<BR/>But actually, Ea 08 does have some interesting Western readings, such as the Acts 8:37 long reading.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com